A blog article written by Jay Lake, suggesting that the Second Amendment is outdated, particularly in regard to the safety of children, using Chicago as example. From
the article:
Sure, we all support some gun ownership. As a boy and a young man I
hunted pheasants, ducks, and geese; for the last two, crouching in a
chilly and cold duck blind on Wonder Lake. I kept my 12 gauge shotgun
clean and well oiled, and the decoys lived in the garage.
But living now in Chicago is another matter.
In one week last year, 52 people were shot, at least 8 fatally, in
gang-related incidents. A one year old girl was grazed on the ear on
West Hastings Street, four men were shot in that incident. That same
evening, a drive-by shooting over drug turf near South Kolin Avenue
resulted in five people being hospitalized in serious to critical
condition. Then, 10 minutes later, police were called to Humboldt Park, a
short distance from where a Puerto Rican Day Festival was in full
swing: two men were shot there, on West Division Street. Later, shortly
after 9 PM, a fifteen year old girl was shot in the hand on West
Evergreen Street.
We live in a much different world than the world our founding fathers
knew. The old west was still new, and police were far sparser than
today's law enforcers. It made sense to allow Americans to carry
firearms, but it doesn't make sense today.
Some may consider the thinking of the drafters of the Constitution,
and of the members of the Supreme Court, as it applies to gun ownership
for a standing militia, and to oppose a potential tyrannical government.
This is a compelling argument, but it may also be outdated and
unrealistic.
.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Please comment. Your comment will be posted after being approved.